THE SHAOLIN MONASTARY IS THE ORIGIN OF ALL MARTIAL ARTS
http://50martialartsmyths.blogspot.com/
Back in the days of the Wild West, there was only one fist-fighter the bad guys really feared.Kwai Chang Caine was a hard-punching half-American, half-Chinese orphan with a weakness for spiritualism and hands that were more dangerous than a gunslinger’s holster. But Caine, a character played by David Carradine in the 1970’s television series Kung Fu, wasn’t just some bruiser who knew how to defend himself. He had grown up in the Shaolin monastery where he was trained by a Shaolin kung fu master — the ultimate source of all martial knowledge.
There was a reason the show’s producers chose Shaolin as the place where Caine was trained.For those who aren’t familiar with the full range and variety of martial arts, it can appear that fighting skills have one central origin: a temple in China’s Henan province where Buddhist monks copied the actions of birds and animals to produce a unique form of fighting from which all others developed. Some methods have enhanced the Shaolin style; others might have misinterpreted it, producing weaker versions that are no closer the real thing than the last Chinese whisper is to the original message. But all forms of hand-to-hand fighting, it appears,owe their origins to Shaolin.
The truth though is very different. While the history and development of martial arts has certainly been heavily influenced by the fighting monks of the Shaolin temple — at least in the way martial arts are shown in movies, if not in their actual fighting forms — Shaolin is just oneof many places where martial arts have been practiced.
And it certainly wasn’t the first.
Even in China, martial arts have been around long before the foundation of the Shaolin temple in the fifth century. The Spring and Autumn Annals, a historical document dating from the eighth tothe fifth centuries BC, mention “hard” and “soft” forms of martial arts. Other documents dating to the Han dynasty (206 BC–220 AD) refer to differences between sports wrestling and unarmed combat, for which manuals were available even then.
Nor was martial arts training restricted to China even at this time. Pankration, a sport practiced at the Greek Olympics in 648 BC, combined wrestling and boxing to produce a complete system that included kicks, locks, throws and even chokes. A tournament might have looked a little like a modern mixed martial arts meet — except that pankration fighters fought naked, something that mixed martial artists tend to avoid.
In India too, the Akananuru and Purananuru, two poetry collections dating from around the first century AD and the second century BC describe a martial arts system using spears, swords,shields, bows and silambam, a kind of staff.
And the techniques used and taught by Roman gladiators and legionnaires might be considered a form of martial arts training too, even if they weren’t spread widely, had little influence and are no longer practiced today.
In truth then, while Shaolin martial arts are certainly important, they’re not the origin of training in armed and unarmed combat. Martial arts began in different places and at different times, in response to certain conditions — such as the attitude of local religions or the violence of the surrounding environment. Each form developed in its own way, influenced by local changes, by talented teachers who discovered ways to improve the technique or by meeting with other forms that inspired new moves altogether.
So how then did one temple in one country come to be seen as the model for all martial arts and the source of knowledge for hand-to-hand combat?
Much of the reason lies in Shaolin’s history . The temple was founded on the slopes of Mount Song, one of the five holy peaks to which Chinese royals were supposed to pay homage. Located just 35 kilometers from Luoyang, an imperial capital, it was also easy to reach and was therefore given plenty of gifts from emperors keen to show their spiritual side.
The temple’s links to royalty didn’t stop with a fortunate location though. The first evidence that the monks took part in combat dates to the early seventh century, when they joined a campaign against bandits. In 621 Shaolin monks helped Li Shimin seize the imperial throne. As a reward,one of the monks was appointed General-in-Chief of the imperial army.
However, it’s not until a thousand years later — during a time of banditry, violence and a weak imperial military — that we first see evidence that Shaolin monks actually engaged in a unique form of combat training. Texts dating to the seventeenth century describe Shaolin monks practicing spear-fighting, unarmed combat, and most importantly, fighting with a staff. That last technique might have been influenced by the fighting technique used by the Monkey King in Journey to the West, a hugely popular book that predates by two centuries the first known use of Shaolin skills.
It was also around this time that we begin to see the spread of the Shaolin myths. When the monks were called on to support the military in its campaigns against pirates, Friar Tianyuan, a Shaolin monk, was placed in charge of the monastic troops. Monks from Hangzhou challenged his command by picking eight champions to face him in combat.. Tianyuan spotted them climbing towards his terrace and beat them off. When they attacked again with swords, Tianyuan used a door-bar to defeat and disarm them single-handedly, winning their respect and their obedience.
And that perhaps is the greatest evidence that Shaolin is not the source of all martial arts. The temple specialized not in animal forms but in fighting with a staff, a method rarely used today outside the ritualized sport of kendo. It is however a rich source of martial arts stories.
Salaam Cikgu Sulaiman
ReplyDeleteI read the selection from your new book. It is interesting.
I have found a few anthropology articles dealing with mostly SE Asain martial arts in anthropology periodicals. If you may want to read them please let me know.
An excerpt from one of them:
fr American Ethnologist
Volume 35. Issue 4. November 2008 (Pages 665 - 681)
JAIDA KIM SAMUDRA
University of Hawai‘i at M¯anoa
Memory in our body:
Thick participation and the translation of kinesthetic Experience.
A Chinese Indonesian student claimed that one has to learn silat in the body before
intellectual understanding and linguistic encoding can be achieved:
Thought is one thing. Movement is another thing. Understanding doesn’t mean I can do it. Sometimes it’s wasted if we have intelligence and we thought that we can do something, but we have not trained our body enough to balance our thoughts. . . . The best is we train, yeah, until the body can reach so far. And then after the body already reaches so far, then the intelligence comes and we can talk about that movement, how to apply it. [The body] can reach . . . thought, rather than
what we thought [coming] first.
Similarly, Suhu Gunawan Rahardja, the current head of
PGB, explained,
You can’t talk about the movement until you have the essence. . . . [It is] like a glass. One person is talking about what the glass is made of, another the shape of the glass, the colors on it, or someone is talking about
what’s inside the glass, or is it empty or full. They all think they are talking about the same thing, but they aren’t. Just making confusion. Only after you know the movement, the essence, you can talk about the whole,
like knowing all about the glass, inside and out, shape and character, all at once.
Researchers may have to participate deeply in the activities of their consultants to achieve relevant “thought” or grasp the “essence” of the subject of their research. This is most necessary in the context of a transnational system in which practitioners do not share a language but are united by shared skills and experiences.10
White Crane Silat is not the exclusive cultural property of any single ethnic, racial,
national, or religious group; rather, silat belongs to those who practice it.11 The keluarga besar (greater family) of PGB
is constituted by people who move their bodies in specific ways. Anthropologists entering such inclusive kinesthetic cultures may be confronted by practitioners who insist that
the only way to understand them is through direct, body-tobody transmission of their cultural knowledge..."
I have added your google blog page to mine.
My family and I congratulate you on your publication and wish you and your family all the best.